Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
I don't see the need for that when you can do whatever you want via the current
smart search engine. It supports ANDs, ORs and automatically understands and
can do whatever you think of.
logs by me in smartsoft: "me smartsoft"
logs by me or moataz mekki "me moataz.mekki"
logs in smartsoft or sharesoft "smartsoft sharesoft"
logs in only smartsoft "smartsoft"
logs with action type test and project smartsoft and made by moataz.mekki or me
"me smartsoft test moataz.mekki"
And the order of the search keywords doesn't matter.
Think of any query in your mind and just type and search lol o.0 .. I spent
quite some time to make the logs search that smart and come up with this custom
algorithm for the logs search engine.
Original comment by eminem.v...@gmail.com
on 2 Jul 2010 at 4:15
It would be easier, and much better actually. Other than being more intuitive,
it's easier to figure out and use.
I really like the work you've done for the log searching so far, but it could
be extended to make it even stronger.
Imagine I want to search for logs by me or moataz in smartsoft. That's not
doable. Even then, imagine I want to search for logs by anyone called something
like "moataz".
Take google. You could search for almost anything using the query box, but
there's always the advanced search for those that need an interface to form up
their query for them.
Original comment by mahmoudsakr87
on 2 Jul 2010 at 4:25
I get it =D , Ok i'll work on another advanced deterministic search algorithm.
I'll commit it the coming few days isA. But I really wanna keep the current
search engine. I just <3 it and thought so much to come up with such a smart
algorithm so, I'll just make it two options: Smart Search and advanced search ;)
Original comment by eminem.v...@gmail.com
on 3 Jul 2010 at 8:15
Please don't work on it as of yet, keep the work until sprint 4.
Original comment by mahmoudsakr87
on 3 Jul 2010 at 8:26
yessir!
Original comment by eminem.v...@gmail.com
on 3 Jul 2010 at 8:45
Original comment by mahmoudsakr87
on 25 Jul 2010 at 11:20
Original comment by eminem.v...@gmail.com
on 26 Jul 2010 at 4:19
Original comment by mahmoudsakr87
on 4 Aug 2010 at 8:17
Original comment by mahmoudsakr87
on 12 Aug 2010 at 9:59
Original comment by mahmoudsakr87
on 16 Aug 2010 at 9:04
Original comment by mahmoudsakr87
on 16 Aug 2010 at 10:07
Issue 192 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by justh...@gmail.com
on 20 Sep 2010 at 11:05
Original comment by justh...@gmail.com
on 20 Sep 2010 at 11:26
Original comment by justh...@gmail.com
on 20 Sep 2010 at 11:38
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mahmoudsakr87
on 1 Jul 2010 at 12:55