[TheiaProk] Update amrfinderplus to v3.12.8; DB: v2024-05-02.2; reduce compute resources

This PR closes #511

🗑️ This dev branch should be deleted after merging to main.

:brain: Aim, Context and Functionality

update default docker image for amrfinderplus
reduce default compute resources & enable preemptible VMs to be used (cheaper)

:hammer_and_wrench: Impacted Workflows/Tasks & Changes Being Made

This will affect the behavior of the workflow(s) even if users don’t change any workflow inputs relative to the last version : Yes

Running this workflow on different occasions could result in different results, e.g. due to use of a live database, "latest" docker image, or stochastic data processing : No

Workflows impacted

TheiaProk_illumina_PE
TheiaProk_illumina_PE
TheiaProk_ONT
TheiaProk_FASTA
NCBI-AMRFinderPlus_PHB

:clipboard: Workflow/Task Step Changes

🔄 Data Processing

Docker/software or software versions changed: v3.11.20 & DB v2023-09-26.1 ➡️ v3.12.8 & DB v2024-05-02.2

Databases or database versions changed: see above

Data processing/commands changed: double quotes added to one option (does not impact how it runs at all)

File processing changed: none

Compute resources changed: reduced cpus to 2, disk_size to 50, and memory to 8. also allow for preemptible VMs to be used

➡️ Inputs

updated default runtime params & docker

⬅️ Outputs

N/A

:test_tube: Testing

Test Dataset

I use a diverse dataset ILMN PE data of bacteria that are known to have point mutations or other organism-specific acquired resistance genes. Almost every species that is part of the amrfinder --organism flag for organism-specific results. See the data table amrfinderplus_testing_sample for full list of species & accessions.

I have also gathered data (reads or genome assemblies only) for 3 organisms we do not yet have support for (Enterobacter asburiae, vibrio vulnificus, vibrio parahaemolyticus) just to see how they behave.

Commandline Testing with MiniWDL or Cromwell (optional)

Tested WDL task successfully with miniwdl.

Terra Testing

TheiaProk_Illumina_PE on diverse test set, many with expected point mutations (organism specific) and acquired resistance genes: https://app.terra.bio/#workspaces/theiagen-validations/curtis-sandbox-theiagen-validations/job_history/711a4e15-16e8-46c3-8a7f-98b9bf2a6455
- ~~⚠️ Need to review outputs~~
- ✅ outputs look good, successfully ran with new docker image & runtime params
TheiaProk_FASTA on a diverse test set: https://app.terra.bio/#workspaces/theiagen-validations/curtis-sandbox-theiagen-validations/job_history/dae9cffb-6862-4348-b9b6-e597ee7fde02
- ~~⚠️ need to review outputs~~
- initial 5 failures due to assemblies not being present in the correct column, ~~will relaunch those separately~~
- ✅ outputs look good, successfully ran with new docker image & runtime params
TheiaProk_FASTA on 5 samples: https://app.terra.bio/#workspaces/theiagen-validations/curtis-sandbox-theiagen-validations/job_history/c34317bc-8456-4b1d-8282-ec7283af263a
- ~~⚠️ need to review outputs~~
- ✅ outputs look good, successfully ran with new docker image & runtime params

Suggested Scenarios for Reviewer to Test

Test on as diverse a set of species as possible. Good to test any of the TheiaProk workflows.

Theiagen Version Release Testing (optional)

Will changes require functional or validation testing (checking outputs etc) during the release? functional, when results are compared to last version of PHB wfs, would be good to check if there are differences
Do new samples need to be added to validation datasets? If so, upload these to the appropriate validation workspace Google bucket (). Please describe the new samples here and why these have been chosen. No
Are there any output files that should be checked after running the version release testing? No

:microscope: Final Developer Checklist

[x] The workflow/task has been tested locally and results, including file contents, are as anticipated
[x] The workflow/task has been tested on Terra and results, including file contents, are as anticipated
[x] The CI/CD has been adjusted and tests are passing (to be completed by Theiagen developer)
[x] Code changes follow the style guide

🎯 Reviewer Checklist

[ ] All impacted workflows/tasks have been tested on Terra with a different dataset than used for development
[ ] All reviewer-suggested scenarios have been tested and any additional
[ ] All changed results have been confirmed to be accurate
[ ] All workflows/tasks impacted by change/s have been tested using a standard validation dataset to ensure no unintended change of functionality
[ ] All code adheres to the style guide
[ ] MD5 sums have been updated
[ ] The PR author has addressed all comments

🗂️ Associated Documentation (to be completed by Theiagen developer)

[x] Relevant documentation on the Public Health Resources "PHB Main" has been updated
[x] Workflow diagrams have been updated to reflect changes. Not necessary to update diagrams

theiagen / public_health_bioinformatics