Closed jamesbaye closed 3 years ago
Thanks for pointing that out! We didn't have a dataset between these sizes and therefore must have missed this. Indeed it should be 1e5 for both boundaries. Could you fix this @danielStrobl? I think 1e5 is written in the manuscript at least, but should double check there as well.
Just for a heads up though... if you intend to use bbknn, i would use it from the original package and adapt the parameters to your dataset.
Thanks @LuckyMD, I'm running bbknn alongside several other methods to compare with an in-house method we're developing so default parameters accessible with your current API should be enough for my current analysis. Thanks for the resource!
Glad it's useful! We're happy for any feedback to make the package easier to use in case you run into more issues! We're in the process of setting up 3 separate packages to make this one pip installable ideally
Appears to be a bug.