Closed thenineteen closed 3 years ago
there is no right way about this
this is the idea that we are integrating lateralisation and localisation data rather than querying them separately. And if we already have some localisation data even from other patients and publications, then it may be easier on the eye to see few brain regions light up and more accurate. OTherwise, the lateralisation which exceed localisation or the lateralisations without localisations result in entire hemispheres lighting up which can give the false impression of data suggesting e.g. occipital lobe resections resulting in seizure freedom from gelastic seizures.
This would have to be implemented for both lat_but_not_loc and lat_exceeds_loc both in Q_L
given the current SVT (3D slicer GUI) has a Visualisation tab with Min. 2D opacity setting set at 0.25 (makes the top 25% opaque) - I think I will leave this feature out for now, because:
this is implemented better in the global lateralisation option
Only pd.concat(join=inner) (if reindexed) or Gif Parcellations that already exist in all_combined_gifs
this avoids excess addition of false localising values to irrelevant regions
related to the changes made in pull #167