Closed fepegar closed 3 years ago
Thanks this is great! As per previous discussions in JD meetings and with data guys, I've implemented a proportions options #118 #8 . This would still be backward compatible using either of your other two options "Rescaling" and the other new options "Softmax".
The combination of proportions is simply their mean, and no further rescaling or softmax or other normalisation is required. A weight for each proportion has not been envisaged because this would treat the semiologies as unequal based on number of datapoints which exacerabted the publication bias towards certain semiologies (in the rescaling and softmax versions we also do not implement any sort of weighting either)
Also resolves #118 (NB semiology level proportions, not study level)
doesn't let me request a review from the initiator of the pull request? @fepegar all the changes are just to incorporate an extra option to the minmax and softmax options added here, namely the proportions option. Some changes are because no scaling is performed for proportions when combining.
has an issue with now only updating colours for combinations of semiologies on 3D slicer but worked in VS code. fixed in commit below.
@fepegar just with the proportions option, can you please make the table show to one decimal place? e.g. in below, the left hippocampus should show 4.0% (3.97%)
It will then be ready to squash and merge
Resolves #8 for now.