thenineteen / Semiology-Visualisation-Tool

Data driven 3D brain visualisation of semiology. Semiology to anatomy translator based on over 4600 patients from 309 peer-reviewed articles.
MIT License
9 stars 6 forks source link

Patient N and % Bars for Loc and Lat #55

Open neurokleos opened 4 years ago

neurokleos commented 4 years ago

The localisation vertical bar should show on one side the number of total localising data points (patient N) used to plot the heatmap and on the other side the normalised %

The lateralisation horizontal bar below the axial and coronal brain, perhaps should be divided in 2 halves R and L, each one showing the lateralising data points (patient N) used to plot the heatmap as well as the normalised %

fepegar commented 4 years ago

Assuming this table, how would you calculate those numbers?

Structure X Structure Y Structure Z
Semiology A 0 1 1000
Semiology B 0 2 3
Semiology C 0 50 5
Semiology D 0 12 13
Semiology E 0 0 0
neurokleos commented 4 years ago

With a combined semiology can be tricky, since the Total absolute sample is different for each semio, but talking about one semio at a time this should be doable. The question is: to get to the colour bar showing data from 0 to 100 intensity, we should process the absolute raw numbers first, so we would just need to show up the raw number next to the %, that's it. Similar issue here (not with colourbar though) https://community.tableau.com/thread/254499

fepegar commented 4 years ago

I didn't know you meant just one semiology. That will be a particular case, though.

If we have just one semiology, I think the best would be just showing the raw numbers, so no percentage would be needed anyway.

What about that horizontal bar? By the way, showing a horizontal bar there might be trickier as this is not implemented in Slicer.

fepegar commented 4 years ago

Reading the email you sent to John, I think I understand a bit better what you want for the horizontal bar, but I'm not sure a bar is needed to show two numbers (if that's indeed what you're thinking of).

neurokleos commented 4 years ago

When a neurologist will interrogate the semio-vis tool to have an idea of where might be the seizure onset zone from which her/his patient's epilepsy signs and symptoms originate, he/she will be proceeding with displaying first the onset (ideally) or as early as possible semiology (that is likely to be a single one, e.g. automatism, dialeptic, aura, tonic), this to have a putative map of the seizure onset zone. So the main thing in terms of colourbars is providing the clinician with an idea of the sample size of patients whose localising/lateralising data they are looking at, for each semiology - only this number can give them the sense of the mega-review data and of how much informative and reliable is the putative map.

fepegar commented 4 years ago

I understand, thanks for the explanation.

What I mean is that a colourbar is used to map colours to numbers. If neurologists need numbers and not colours, there's no need for a bar.

neurokleos commented 4 years ago

They need both. The colour is a way to visualise number. An example it comes to my mind is like when you hear a music without knowing its musical notes. For someone who wants to understand the music better it would be nice to know the notes as well.