Open theodorekwok opened 2 years ago
No details provided by team.
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
Set time on large integers invalid, although UG states that they should be.
UG states that
However, inputting the below command yields an exception, although 9999999999 is an integer.
[original: nus-cs2113-AY2122S1/pe-interim#881] [original labels: severity.Medium type.FunctionalityBug]
[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]
This is an issue with the Integer object within Java itself.
Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)
Reason for disagreement: I disagree that this is a duplicated issue as it is about the indexing of deleteRecipe feature and not about the set feature. Moreover the team did not provide any explanation for why this is a duplicate to convince me.
Team chose [response.NotInScope
]
Reason for disagreement: I disagree that this is notInScope as the issue lies in the specificity of the error message which should have been something that is taken into consideration since version 1.
Team chose [severity.Medium
]
Originally [severity.Low
]
Reason for disagreement: I believe the severity should be low not medium given that it is extremely rare for users to have that many recipes.
^Above a very large number was given, but the error message told me to provide a valid integer