New name instead of BernardQueueing

[sagikazarmark]

Ideas plz, this name gave me cancer.

[rosstuck]

Just League\Tactician\Bernard then? We're probably going to have other Queuing packages in the future so calling it League\Tactician\Queuing might be a bit too broad.

[sagikazarmark]

That might be better. I know there was arguments against it, because Bernard is too vague, but it is not the package name that should give the description, is it?

[sagikazarmark]

@rosstuck Is tactician-bernard and League\Tactician\Bernard fine for you?

[rosstuck]

Works for me! We can document the queueing aspect in the manual.

[sagikazarmark]

OK, let's leave it after the PR gets merge to make sure we don't get lost in some composer configuration madness.

[sagikazarmark]

@rosstuck as soon as the middleware architecture is finished I am going to open a PR which does every in-repo modifications to be able to rename it to tactician-bernard. After that the following should be done:

• Renaming this repo to tactician-bernard
• Deleting it from packagist as exactly 0 downloads happend so far
• Readding the package to packagist with the new name
• Updating travis and scrutinizer

I am assigning this to you @rosstuck and asking you to do what needs to be done when the time comes. :sunglasses:

[rosstuck]

Aight, can do. :)

[sagikazarmark]

@rosstuck see #10

[rosstuck]

Okay, should be done. Scrutinizer is showing NaN for code coverage but I'm going to assume that's a temporary issue for now.

[sagikazarmark]

Yeah, it should be temporary. If you review/merge the docs PR, I am going to tag v0.1.

[sagikazarmark]

Thanks