Closed sagikazarmark closed 9 years ago
Just League\Tactician\Bernard then? We're probably going to have other Queuing packages in the future so calling it League\Tactician\Queuing might be a bit too broad.
That might be better. I know there was arguments against it, because Bernard is too vague, but it is not the package name that should give the description, is it?
@rosstuck Is tactician-bernard
and League\Tactician\Bernard
fine for you?
Works for me! We can document the queueing aspect in the manual.
OK, let's leave it after the PR gets merge to make sure we don't get lost in some composer configuration madness.
@rosstuck as soon as the middleware architecture is finished I am going to open a PR which does every in-repo modifications to be able to rename it to tactician-bernard
. After that the following should be done:
tactician-bernard
I am assigning this to you @rosstuck and asking you to do what needs to be done when the time comes. :sunglasses:
Aight, can do. :)
@rosstuck see #10
Okay, should be done. Scrutinizer is showing NaN for code coverage but I'm going to assume that's a temporary issue for now.
Yeah, it should be temporary. If you review/merge the docs PR, I am going to tag v0.1.
Thanks
Ideas plz, this name gave me cancer.