After the feedback from Bastiaan about the undescriptive naming of Settings.setter the plan was to adjust the name when examining the code I came to the conclusion that this can easily be fixed with a minor refactor. the test has been updated accordingly.
Coverage decreased (-0.01%) to 93.444% when pulling a72f9f51544e6333a1af2fee4325416e6f0487f9 on 152_-_Remove_Status.setter into 818c5a7662dfcdbc0e82a8b7fd4617117a672ddb on dev.
Coverage decreased (-0.009%) to 93.448% when pulling 39124800cb258c410e365c78a8e29c26671a8dd2 on 152_-_Remove_Status.setter into 818c5a7662dfcdbc0e82a8b7fd4617117a672ddb on dev.
Coverage decreased (-0.009%) to 93.448% when pulling 39124800cb258c410e365c78a8e29c26671a8dd2 on 152_-_Remove_Status.setter into 818c5a7662dfcdbc0e82a8b7fd4617117a672ddb on dev.
Will close #152.
After the feedback from Bastiaan about the undescriptive naming of Settings.setter the plan was to adjust the name when examining the code I came to the conclusion that this can easily be fixed with a minor refactor. the test has been updated accordingly.