Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 2 years ago
I'm sorry, I don't understand. Objects whose class is not present on
serialization are ignored?
Sounds good in general terms since it's always better to be "fault tolerant",
but I didn't catch the exact case.
Could you explain again, please?
thanks!
Original comment by tinchod...@gmail.com
on 1 Mar 2013 at 9:42
For some reason, in my setup I was able to load a graph with objects whose
class was not present in the image. When I wanted to verify that right now with
a fresh fuel installation, that didn't work (FLClassNotFound was signaled, as
expected).
Something's a bit weird here� let me investigate and I'll get back to you.
Original comment by maxle...@gmail.com
on 4 Mar 2013 at 5:09
ok
It's strange, I don't remember we have ever supported this.
But I can be a good idea. IIRC in Parcels
(http://scg.unibe.ch/archive/papers/Mira05aParcels.pdf) they support something
like this. I guess a kind of temporary/anonymous class is created with the
original name and the original instance variable names (information that we
have).This way the instances can be materialized. I don't know very well.
Original comment by tinchod...@gmail.com
on 5 Mar 2013 at 2:22
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will remain open but will probably not come into focus. If you still think this should receive some attention, leave a comment. Thank you for your contributions.
Was probably a setup issue.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
maxle...@gmail.com
on 1 Mar 2013 at 8:38