Closed thespacedoctor closed 8 months ago
I have all SOXS FITS header keywords now getting added to the SQLite data-organiser database (I have generalised the code to process X-shooter and SOXS).
I am now at the point where I need to filter the calibration/science frames uniquely into their various sets (bias, darks, flats, order-centre tracing etc). I have found this is not yet possible with the values currently set by the data-controller. I have put in following change requests to Davide:
For SOXS spectral data, we should be using ECHELLE
in DPR.TECH instead of SPECTRUM
as the principal value (see Table 11 or Data Interface Control Document):
Can we use the second qualifier in DPR.TECH to state the type of 'slit' being used?
so ECHELLE,SLIT
, ECHELLE,PINHOLE
or ECHELLE,MULTI-PINHOLE
This will move the observation mode to the third qualifier in DPR.TECH (if needed), e.g.
ECHELLE,SLIT,NODDING
, ECHELLE,SLIT,STARE
or ECHELLE,SLIT,OFFSET
This will allow me to distinguish each calibration/science uniquely from just the DPR keywords.
For the DPR.TYPE, when observing an ARC lamp, we should be using LAMP,WAVE
and not STD,WAVE
I had a call with Davide, and he has agreed to the changes. Davide is onboarding a colleague who is going to make the changes in the instrument control software and then reissue the template FITS headers to test with the data organiser.
There are still a few niggles to iron out with the ICS templates (lamps etc). But the data organiser is now in good shape to organise SOXS data.
https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1-KzHjK8CHhJpU6ZZOwYlSGom8qvSmcZa