CIPL for 6.20

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Why not making an 6.20 CIPL for PSP 1000 and 2000 v1/v2

Original issue reported on code.google.com by crah...@hotmail.com on 15 Feb 2012 at 2:25

[GoogleCodeExporter]

i believe there's no need of it, 6.20 permanent patch is something for people 
with unhackable mobos, there's 6.39/60 CIPL for the others and most of the 6.20 
plugins works well on 6.39.

Original comment by alessand...@gmail.com on 16 Feb 2012 at 9:53

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Yes, i know that the permanent patch work fine on all PSP, but the CIPL is the 
best way to make an full CFW on hackable PSP, so you can make permanent patch 
only for unhackable PSP.

another think, why not using btconfig files on your PRO CFW 6.39/60 like all 
old 5.xxx CFW.

Original comment by crah...@hotmail.com on 17 Feb 2012 at 12:28

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

A sincere thankyou to all the devs for coding and releasing this project GPL 
style...

I have I think a legitimate usage case for a 6.20 cIPL: running 02g with 
hardmod Pandora, 6.39's cIPL and a "sleepfix" IPL on the memory stick, the PSP 
is functional with the hacked battery - no issues as long as MS is present at 
power on.  But without cIPL, the PSP turns on to a black screen (ie: tries to 
enter recovery mode normally)

Obviously there are workarounds (AC adapter, just get another battery cheapie! 
; )

Original comment by 00rashma...@gmail.com on 9 May 2012 at 4:02

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Yes, with cIPL the PSP is fully hacked with full custom firmware, we can use 
pandora batery like normal one, but with permanent patch the PSP is not fully 
hacked, it's just a patch to make the custum firmware permanent, and we can't 
use the pandora battery, i think the perma patch is good idea for the 
unhackable PSP (PSP 2000v3 and up) but for the hackable PSP, an custom firmware 
with cIPL is the best way to hack this models.

Original comment by crah...@hotmail.com on 9 May 2012 at 6:58