dunkOnIT
commented
1 year ago Seems reasonable, although the checkboxes seem like frustrating UX. I'd say rather just make text in the text boxes spawned for warnings mandatory, and have an optional "general remarks" box at the bottom.
I assume this is trying to solve inefficiencies/frustrations in WRT's workflow. I'd say see how things progress with just the mandatory text boxes (I expect those will be a big improvement), and if there are still issues then we can look at checkboxes.
Currently, in results submission form, the delegate has to write the comments to warnings in single text box.
Instead, under each section of warning, we can show a checkbox and a textbox to address the warnings of that section (this will show up only if there is at least 1 warning in that section).
The checkbox will be with a text "I confirm that the data leading to the warning(s) is accurate and will provide an explanation below".
The textbox will be having a placeholder "Please add the comment on the warning". (type will be rounds/results/persons)
At the very end, we can also give a textbox 'Additional comment if any' which will be optional and also a checkbox "I confirm the information displayed on the WCA website's events page and on the competition's schedule page reflect what happened during the competition." which must be checked by the delegate to post the results.
This will ensure that the delegates will be able to address each warning section separately instead of a single box. Also, this will allow the delegates do not add any text in case there are no warnings.
cc: @thewca/wrt