Open thewongdylan opened 2 months ago
As you can see from the screenshot, the official website states that the return arrow does not need an explicit label. The examples provided also don't have labels.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Description The UML diagram for the
list
command contains an extra pair of arrows that call an empty method and return nothing.Expected These arrows should either not be present or should be labelled correctly.
Actual The arrows are present in the UML diagram![Screenshot 2024-04-19 at 5.20.59 PM.png](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thewongdylan/pe/main/files/09010762-cf6f-4bfb-8e73-c7751eae973f.png)
Reason for severity Does not affect usage but may affect user's understanding of the implementation of the
list
command