Open jcelerier opened 3 years ago
i'd recommend to pass clang-tidy on that whole code to uniformize things. Also clang-format (you can use the .clang-format in the score repo).
Also for clang-tidy you can pass the
clang-analyzer* performance-* bugprone-* readability-*
category of checks (qt creator can do it : https://doc.qt.io/qtcreator/creator-clang-tools.html)
see https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/readability-identifier-naming.html
this was addressed in 6ddcc4c but it does lead to some weird results. Maybe, I can fine tune by hand ? or should it come out perfect ?
i'd recommend to pass clang-tidy on that whole code to uniformize things. Also clang-format (you can use the .clang-format in the score repo).
Also for clang-tidy you can pass the
category of checks (qt creator can do it : https://doc.qt.io/qtcreator/creator-clang-tools.html)