Open mxmlnkn opened 3 years ago
The robotpy-cppheaderparser
package, which is used to parse the headers, indeed parses the member function as a method (with a wrong name). Maybe this could be reported upstream.
I see. Thanks for investigating. I think reporting it upstream would be the best choice.
Given this input header:
and parsing it with:
I get (shortened for brevity):
It looks like
m_startBlockFinder
got interpreted as a method with name>
instead of being recognized as a member.