Closed Neves-P closed 4 years ago
R/get_average_nltt_matrix.R:14:1: style: functions should have cyclomatic complexity of less than 15, this has 16.
​get_average_nltt_matrix <- function(
^
R/nltts_plot.R:19:1: style: functions should have cyclomatic complexity of less than 15, this has 17.
​nltts_plot <- function(
^
R/stretch_nltt_matrix.R:22:1: style: functions should have cyclomatic complexity of less than 15, this has 16.
​stretch_nltt_matrix <- function(
^
:exclamation: No coverage uploaded for pull request base (
develop@a38f6a4
). Click here to learn what that means. The diff coverage is100%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #55 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage ? 100%
========================================
Files ? 13
Lines ? 555
Branches ? 0
========================================
Hits ? 555
Misses ? 0
Partials ? 0
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
R/nltt_diff_exact_extinct.R | 100% <100%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a38f6a4...3a0496a. Read the comment docs.
As described in #52, @lintr-bot gives warnings regarding cyclomatic complexity. I have reduced it in
nltt_diff_exact_extinct()
by splitting the input checking onto a dedicated, internal function:check_input_event_times()
. In the processes I also (hopefully) simplified and made a few checks slightly more legible. As far as I can see all tests and checks pass, so this should contribute to fixing #52!@thijsjanzen, @richelbilderbeek, please let me know if I can help further, of if I should make some modifications on my additions đź‘Ť