search

things4u / ESP-1ch-Gateway

Version 6 of the single channel gateway
MIT License
358 stars 143 forks source link

a lot of uplinks missed #46

Closed antonio-emilio closed 3 years ago

antonio-emilio commented 3 years ago

First of all, I want to thank the creators of this repository. Such a useful code! I've been missing a lot of uplinks. Last week I made my first test outside, but i received a lot of messages like this one: "Thu 11-08-2020 17:04:42- SCAN:: I=CDDONE CDDETD , F=0, SF=7, E=0, S=RX , eT=13414520, dT=2241"" instead of the UP RXPK.

It works, but I've been missing a lot of packages... is there something I can do?

hujiese commented 3 years ago

I met the same problem, set _CAN=0 may work bette,but the problem is still occur.

antonio-emilio commented 3 years ago

When I disabled CAD, it worked better, but I still have a lot of problems.. For example, if I try to send two packages with a tiny delay, I only get the first package.... Seems like the gateway only recognize packages with some delay between them....

platenspeler commented 3 years ago

I cannot find more examples right now. But you can see two sensor receptions within a few seconds. I have not experienced delays or so, but I will pay more attention next days.

Sun 06-09-2020 23:21:32 lora-43 temp DS18B20 0 868100000 7 -66 Sun 06-09-2020 23:21:28 lora-40 airquality 0 868100000 9 -85

Regards,

Maarten

From: Antonio Emilio notifications@github.com Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 1:08 PM To: things4u/ESP-1ch-Gateway ESP-1ch-Gateway@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [things4u/ESP-1ch-Gateway] a lot of uplinks missed (#46)

When I disabled CAD, it worked better, but I still have a lot of problems.. For example, if I try to send two packages with a tiny delay, I only get the first package.... Seems like the gateway only recognize packages with some delay between them....

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fthings4u%2FESP-1ch-Gateway%2Fissues%2F46%23issuecomment-687079160&data=02%7C01%7C%7C0028b634ecd343e17d4708d850c2bb16%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637348144567985212&sdata=f8XJCCWJfsoz9ZahNGmjpQr37yYI9SfeKBszX31b%2FeA%3D&reserved=0, or unsubscribehttps://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FABMSRHHBYBMCBYEGYJPQPXTSEDC7PANCNFSM4P3T2LXA&data=02%7C01%7C%7C0028b634ecd343e17d4708d850c2bb16%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637348144567995202&sdata=V9nRnaOUq4RH8YEtgD2QfoNDSxj286zlKRtdwhMwrMk%3D&reserved=0.

Samuel-ZDM commented 3 years ago

I had the same problem. I manage to fix by updating the code of the final device. I put only one frequency for sending data and it reduces packet loss.

antonio-emilio commented 3 years ago

I met the same problem, set _CAN=0 may work bette,but the problem is still occur.

It was the best option for me.... not the solution, but at least worked better.