search

thinkle / gourmet

Gourmet Recipe Manager
GNU General Public License v2.0
338 stars 138 forks source link

Application start ends with error #507

Closed ockham closed 11 years ago

ockham commented 11 years ago

Converted from SourceForge issue 1355269, submitted by SourceForge user brango67 on 2005-11-12 16:05:18 UTC.

Start of gourmet installed from Debian package gourmet_0.8.5.13-1_i386.deb ends with following error: brango@budvar:~$ gourmet Loading gnomeprint failed: trying wx importing wxprinter Loading wx failed: trying lpr Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/gourmet", line 33, in ? import gourmet.GourmetRecipeManager File "/usr/share/gourmet/GourmetRecipeManager.py", line 5, in ? import prefs, prefsGui, shopgui, reccard, convertGui, fnmatch, tempfile File "/usr/share/gourmet/shopgui.py", line 3, in ? import recipeManager, convert, WidgetSaver, reccard File "/usr/share/gourmet/reccard.py", line 18, in ? from importers.importer import parse_range File "/usr/share/gourmet/importers/init.py", line 2, in ? import interactive_importer File "/usr/share/gourmet/importers/interactive_importer.py", line 326 @autostart_rec

Distribution: Debian Unstable Kernel: 2.6.14 Gourmet version: 0.8.5.13 dpkg -l libgtk2 ii libgtk2-perl 1.101-1 ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.10-1 ii libgtk2.0-bin 2.6.10-1 ii libgtk2.0-common 2.6.10-1 ii libgtk2.0-doc 2.6.10-1

dpkg -l pythongtk ii python-gtk-1.2 0.6.12-4 ii python-gtk2 2.6.3-2 ii python2.3-gtk2 2.6.3-2

ockham commented 11 years ago

Submitted by SourceForge user brango67 on 2005-11-24 21:09:29 UTC.

Logged In: YES user_id=1256166

gourmet 0.8.5.12-1 now starts and works!

ockham commented 11 years ago

Submitted by SourceForge user thomas_hinkle on 2005-11-18 03:00:20 UTC.

Logged In: YES user_id=1030390

This error is fixed with the latest in both stable and unstable. It may be there's one other syntax error (see https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1357268&group_id=108118&atid=649652).

Please update and let me know if the latest packages run. If not, try the fix suggested in the other bug report -- if that does the trick, let me know and I'll update again and release. I don't want to try and release another fix for python2.3 until I'm confident it will work. Otherwise, I need someone still using python2.3 to help me make sure I've gotten everything ironed out.

ockham commented 11 years ago

Submitted by SourceForge user nobody on 2005-11-14 17:29:22 UTC.

Logged In: NO

I just hit the same problem on Debian unstable.

Debian has python2.4, but has only python2.3-metakit, (that I can find anyway).

-Carl Worth cworth@cworth.org

ockham commented 11 years ago

Submitted by SourceForge user thomas_hinkle on 2005-11-13 04:08:48 UTC.

Logged In: YES user_id=1030390

Oops -- accidentally introduced a dependency on python2.4 with the latest version. Are there still distros out there stuck with python2.3? If this represents a substantial number of users, we'll have to do without some of the nice new features...