Closed tarikhagustia closed 4 months ago
Thanks for reporting this, we haven't added support for sigmint extensions yet but for 1155 its just the domain name changing as you pointed out so I just put up a quick PR: https://github.com/thirdweb-dev/js/pull/3226
will merge shortly and you can test it with npm i thirdweb@nightly
once it merges
Hi there,
I'm using signature minting on my custom contract using SignatureMint1155 extension and SDK v4 currently, however i got an error while using signature mint using SDK v5. "Invalid Request".
But when i created a new contract using pre-build contract and sdk v5 its working fine. After digging the source code i found that the EIP712 implementation between the pre-built and the extension is different.
the pre-built version is using
TokenERC1155
as a domain name https://github.com/thirdweb-dev/contracts/blob/0353be5d8fa8f93247daa320bbfe09a38a112d72/contracts/prebuilts/token/TokenERC1155.sol#L149and the extension using
SignatureMintERC1155
as a domain name https://github.com/thirdweb-dev/contracts/blob/0353be5d8fa8f93247daa320bbfe09a38a112d72/contracts/extension/SignatureMintERC1155.sol#L20C27-L20C47and looks like the V5 sdk using
TokenERC1155
as a default domain. was wondering if we can add an option to change the domain name.