Closed Censhengcai closed 2 years ago
we dowmnoaded the BGNet.pth ,then run the etest.py to generate the predicted results, finally I run the eval.py. I get the final evalution metrics. But I found that the metric results which I tested has a big gap with that in the paper. could you tell what problems in me my steps. It is very importance for me! thanks your great contrubitions!
There is nothing wrong with your process. I downloaded the model and tested it, and the result was correct. I don't know why you get different results. You can send your WeChat to my mailbox: thograce@163.com and we can chat on WeChat.
my Wechat is 18378913458, thanks you!
------------------ Original message ------------------ From: "thograce"; Sendtime: Monday, Sep 19, 2022 10:10 AM To: "thograce/BGNet"; Cc: @.***>; "Author"; Subject: Re: [thograce/BGNet] about the evalution (Issue #5)
we dowmnoaded the BGNet.pth ,then run the etest.py to generate the predicted results, finally I run the eval.py. I get the final evalution metrics. But I found that the metric results which I tested has a big gap with that in the paper. could you tell what problems in me my steps. It is very importance for me! thanks your great contrubitions!
There is nothing wrong with your process. I downloaded the model and tested it, and the result was correct. I don't know why you get different results. You can send your WeChat to my mailbox: @.*** and we can chat on WeChat.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
we dowmnoaded the BGNet.pth ,then run the etest.py to generate the predicted results, finally I run the eval.py. I get the final evalution metrics. But I found that the metric results which I tested has a big gap with that in the paper. could you tell what problems in me my steps. It is very importance for me! thanks your great contrubitions!