Closed tholoien closed 8 years ago
When we met with Risa, we discussed the following splits:
To assess significant differences between the resulting models, we'll need a way of quantifying uncertainty in the GMM parameters: we decided we'd need jackknife or bootstrap, if we go with the astroML XDGMM...
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 3:38 PM, tholoien notifications@github.com wrote:
Split the SN sample into training and validation sets and use this to train the model. Use cross-validation to determine the right number of parameters to incorporate and measure the accuracy of the model.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/tholoien/empiriciSN/issues/12, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AArY95-zf-lVJl1v-gjO2iF2Dg1u0JNVks5qTtFhgaJpZM4JIc76 .
Looks like this issue can be closed, @tholoien ! You can re-issue the CV optimization separately, but for now you have a trained model that can be used to explore the conditional PDFs to allow SNe to be predicted in new (test set) host galaxies.
Split the SN sample into training and validation sets and use this to train the model. Use cross-validation to determine the right number of parameters to incorporate and measure the accuracy of the model.