search

thomHayner / AI_Hawk

AI Hawk AIHawk is a tool that automates the jobs application process. Utilizing artificial intelligence, it enables users to apply for multiple job offers in an automated and personalized way.
MIT License
0 stars 0 forks source link

[DOCS]: Doesn't specify LinkedIn #60

Open thomHayner opened 1 month ago

thomHayner commented 1 month ago

Affected documentation section

Readme

Documentation improvement description

Can you fix the docs to say that this only works for Linkedin?

Why is this change necessary?

No response

Additional context

No response

ai-hawk-birdwatcher[bot] commented 1 month ago

Hi there @thomHayner, thanks for opening this issue! Give me a second to to classify the issue, apply labels and see if I have any follow up questions before writing an official report. Also, come join us on Telegram to discuss this issue and other topics with our community! Telegram

ai-hawk-birdwatcher[bot] commented 1 month ago

The issue provided deals with improving documentation and the provided template is for a bug report, which doesn't match the current need. We need a template specifically aimed at documentation improvements. Could you please provide the correct template related to documentation issues?

thomHayner commented 1 month ago

I used the correct template already

ai-hawk-birdwatcher[bot] commented 1 month ago

Thank you for providing the information about the issue concerning the documentation.

  1. Analyze New Issue:

    • The issue identifies an improvement for the documentation related to the Readme, specifying that a feature only works for LinkedIn.

  2. Primary Label Selection:

    • The issue appears to be about improving the documentation, so the primary label "documentation" is appropriate.

  3. Add Primary Label: 

    addLabel("documentation")

  4. Get the Report Template:

    getReportTemplate("documentation")

  5. Compare Information with Report Template:

    • From the information provided, we know:
      • Affected Documentation Section: Readme
      • Documentation Improvement Description: Update to specify LinkedIn usage

    However, there's no information under "Why is this change necessary?" and "Additional context."

  6. Follow-up Questions:

    • Can you please provide why this change is necessary? This helps in understanding the impact or requirement for the documentation update.
    • If there are any specific examples or scenarios where this has caused confusion, providing those would be helpful as additional context.

Once I have these additional details, I can proceed with completing the official report. Please provide any further information you might think is relevant.