Closed fridex closed 2 years ago
/sig stack-guidance /priority important-soon
@Gregory-Pereira worked on a similar item in https://github.com/thoth-station/s2i-thoth/issues/231, related docs:
The procedure is very similar, we need to wait for a stable UBI/RHEL 9 Python s2i.
I will go ahead and take a look at this as well. /assign
I will go ahead and take a look at this as well.
Thanks 💯 Worth checking the current state of UBI/RHEL 9 Python s2i. If they are considered stable, we should wait.
So it looks like there is some Red Hat documentation saying that it exists, yet when I try to pull the ubi9 image like the ubi8 one it can't find it.
$ podman pull registry.access.redhat.com/ubi8/ubi
Trying to pull registry.access.redhat.com/ubi8/ubi:latest...
Getting image source signatures
Checking if image destination supports signatures
Copying blob de9bc33d7337 skipped: already exists
Copying blob effc4ea612c8 skipped: already exists
Copying config b1b0a30a72 done
Writing manifest to image destination
Storing signatures
b1b0a30a7282d9c9387499c2ef7992bd19958e7bb533904c1a316991b4739424
$ podman pull registry.access.redhat.com/ubi9/ubi
Trying to pull registry.access.redhat.com/ubi9/ubi:latest...
WARN[0000] failed, retrying in 1s ... (1/3). Error: initializing source docker://registry.access.redhat.com/ubi9/ubi:latest: reading manifest latest in registry.access.redhat.com/ubi9/ubi: unknown: Not Found
WARN[0001] failed, retrying in 1s ... (2/3). Error: initializing source docker://registry.access.redhat.com/ubi9/ubi:latest: reading manifest latest in registry.access.redhat.com/ubi9/ubi: unknown: Not Found
This either means 1, it doesn't exist yet, or 2, the repo configuration for the ubi9
image is different from that of ubi8
. I have tried a variation for rhel9
as well, and still no luck.
It appears to be in Beta right now: Red Hat provides Red Hat Enterprise Linux Beta access to all subscribed Red Hat accounts.
@frenzymadness, could you please let us know the current state for UBI 9 Python s2i? What is its state and when it could become stable? Thanks in advance.
Hi. UBI9 is still beta and we haven't started building our Python container image on top of that yet. We are currently working on Centos stream 9: https://github.com/sclorg/s2i-python-container/pull/501 But there are some blockers.
I see the image in the catalog: https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/ubi9-beta/ubi/60a6ea70f13ea7781b9fd615?container-tabs=gti
But I also cannot pull it:
Trying to pull registry.access.redhat.com/ubi9-beta/ubi:9.0.0beta-892...
Error: Source image rejected: None of the signatures were accepted, reasons: Invalid GPG signature: gpgme.Signature{Summary:128, Fingerprint:"938A80CAF21541EB",…
Thanks, @frenzymadness. We will wait for the stable release then. Thanks again 👍🏻
/lifecycle frozen
@codificat could you work with @Gregory-Pereira on this? thx!
A new image is available now: https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/ubi9/python-39/61a61032bfd4a5234d59629e?tag=1-59&push_date=1656417750000 probably time to re-visit this.
We are working on Python container image based on UBI 9: https://github.com/sclorg/s2i-python-container/pull/528
My estimation is that it should be finished this week.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Let's monitor release cycle of UBI/RHEL 9 and provide relevant solvers to the deployment once they are available and ready to be used.