Closed mz026 closed 7 years ago
Thank you for the pull request, @mz026.
I'm curious why you ran into such a situation. To be frank, I don't think we should support this, as it goes against the RSpec conventions.
@gylaz We really enjoy the experience of vim-rspec since it makes our TDD process much faster. But the testing framework we are using has different naming convention from RSpec, that's why we need an option to release the file name restriction. Thanks anyway!!
@mz026 Which framework are you using? You may want to have a look at https://github.com/janko-m/vim-test (it supports multiple).
@gylaz vim-test looks cool! Currently we are using pork
as our testing framework: https://github.com/godfat/pork
@gylaz looks like this can possibly be closed?
Yep, closing.
With this option we can run rspec without requiring naming test file as
*_spec.rb