threat9 / routersploit

Exploitation Framework for Embedded Devices
Other
12.12k stars 2.31k forks source link

Shellshock #68

Closed awnumar closed 8 years ago

awnumar commented 8 years ago

Manufacturers are pretty relaxed about firmware updates. After shellshock was discovered, not many home devices were patched. I'd wager most home-routers can still be pwned using it.

m0sia commented 8 years ago

Most embedded systems use busybox ash(or other tiny shell variations) that are not effected by shellshock.

If we are talking about well advertised vulnerabilities with unique names, then it make sense to add heartbleed. Many routers use old openssl.

lucyoa commented 8 years ago

@libeclipse @m0sia that are actually very good ideas. Shellshock vulnerability is not so common on embedded device nevertheless it is worth to implement module for this as well.

lucyoa commented 8 years ago

@libeclipse I added new module with this commit: 2e2f1646e8f0734ec52378c0bc5c302545397272 @m0sia I also added new module request for heartbleed: https://github.com/reverse-shell/routersploit/issues/72