Open rwiller opened 3 years ago
Thanks @rwiller I'm glad you found a work around! I think that we will wait for the newer interface to XSPEC to go online rather than looking for a fix to this. I will keep open just in case anyone else runs into the same problem . Feel free to post your workaround here if you think it would be helpful!
Right, in the file XS_ismabs.py, which is created by astromodels (located in /home/
sui:
delta: 0.001
desc: (see https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/xanadu/xspec/manual/XspecModels.html)
free: true
initial value: 2.14
max: 1E6
min: '0.'
unit: 10^16
suii:
delta: 0.001
desc: (see https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/xanadu/xspec/manual/XspecModels.html)
free: false
initial value: 0.0
max: 1E6
min: '0.'
unit: 10^16
suiii:
delta: 0.001
desc: (see https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/xanadu/xspec/manual/XspecModels.html)
free: false
initial value: 0.0
max: 1E6
min: '0.'
unit: 10^16
Can this be closed?
The model XS_ismabs as build by astromodels only has 29 out of the required 31 parameters. I believ the reason is that the abundances of S II and S III are missing due to their names being taken by Si I (sii in the code) and Si II (siii). I suggest to use the name su instead of s to denote the ionization states of sulphur. Maybe consider naming silicon differently as well to avoid confusion with the indication of the ionization state.