Guess: Conflicting routes, or the same route is added twice.
found device with mac:
found device with mac: 6a:9d:df:5f:9d:e2
found device with mac: aa:84:90:f9:d1:a7
setting up (6a:9d:df:5f:9d:e2)
failed to set route 10.20.0.0/16 via 10.20.2.1 on interface 6a:9d:df:5f:9d:e2: file exists
failed to set route 100.64.0.0/16 via 10.20.2.1 on interface 6a:9d:df:5f:9d:e2: file exists
setting up (aa:84:90:f9:d1:a7)
failed to set route 200::/7 via 301:8afa:1b85:5b6e::1 on interface aa:84:90:f9:d1:a7: file exists
generating host ssh keys
PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: seq=0 ttl=114 time=43.415 ms
A test need to be done first to inspect the state of the VM routing table, and that all routes are in place. Are there any routes from the config that should be there but is missing.
If the routes are conflicting (why) may be we should metric to prioriteries public ips for example over private
Guess: Conflicting routes, or the same route is added twice.
metricto prioriteries public ips for example over private