Open aswin-raghavan opened 5 years ago
Follow up: I realize that this might not have anything to do with training as in darkflow. I pulled the tiny yolov2-voc cfg and weights from here (Table in https://pjreddie.com/darknet/yolov2/) where they claim an mAP of 57% but instead what I get is an mAP of 26%. So either
Any other clue about why this happens? I noticed a really low mAP on my results, too, but I thought it was because those pre-trained weights don't really fit good my research case (pedestrian detection from drones, so really tiny and small subjects to detect, as well as a lot of occlusion, bad quality and camera angle very different from the traditional pedestrian detection training images)
@Alemolet I cant say im well versed in YOLO but im pretty sure its performance dips when it comes to small objects. I think SSD would be a better alternative.
Can anyone tell me how to find the mAP value for yolo v2 darkflow? I am using windows system
Thanks for darkflow. Clearly a lot of effort was put in to this.
I trained yolo.cfg on VOC2007 data using ADAM for > 100k steps, and eventually the loss was around 2.0xxx. I am aware this is not as good as the darknet loss of < 1.0, but darkflow seems to implement a slightly different loss function wrt
rescore
.I also realized that you may have wrongly linked the testing dataset of VOC2007 as the training dataset, but this might not have any major impact on the result.
This trained model has a significantly lower mAP of 35%, compared to YOLO, and I wonder why? What can I do to improve this?
[mAP was calculated using https://github.com/rafaelpadilla/Object-Detection-Metrics#how-to-use-this-project]