Open wuhuizuo opened 1 year ago
/lgtm
/lgtm
/lgtm cancel
/lgtm
/lgtm
/lgtm
try to lgtm duplicate by same reviewer.
/lgtm cancel
/lgtm cancel
deny(reset) when we did not got full LGTMs
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED
This pull-request has been approved by: wuhuizuo, zuo-bot-1
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
The pull request process is described here
/hold /lgtm
Timeline:
2023-03-24 09:12:43.838552152 +0000 UTC m=+279.843525575
: :ballot_box_with_check: agreed by zuo-bot-1.2023-03-24 09:14:50.959881414 +0000 UTC m=+406.964854840
: :ballot_box_with_check: agreed by zuo-bot-2.2023-03-24 09:15:11.320324679 +0000 UTC m=+427.325298102
: :heavy_multiplication_x::repeat: reset by zuo-bot-2.2023-03-24 09:15:33.861124866 +0000 UTC m=+449.866098291
: :ballot_box_with_check: agreed by zuo-bot-1.2023-03-24 09:20:22.565173444 +0000 UTC m=+738.570146871
: :heavy_multiplication_x::repeat: reset by zuo-bot-1.2023-03-24 09:22:07.281939805 +0000 UTC m=+843.286913230
: :ballot_box_with_check: agreed by zuo-bot-1.2023-03-24 09:22:46.766513925 +0000 UTC m=+882.771487342
: :ballot_box_with_check: agreed by zuo-bot-2./chatgpt hello.
/chatgpt hello
/chatgpt hello
In response to a chatgpt label: I'm sorry but as an AI language model, I cannot access the given pull request link. However, I can give you a general guideline on how to review a GitHub pull request:
Check the purpose of the pull request: The first thing you have to do is to understand why the pull request was made. Check the title and description of the request to find out what changes are being made and why.
Look at the code changes: Review the actual code that has been changed. This includes looking at any added or deleted lines, and the modifications that have been made. Pay attention to formatting, indentation, and variable names.
Test the changes: Run the code locally and test the changes made to make sure everything works correctly.
Check for errors: Look for error messages or warnings that have been introduced with the new code.
Consider the scope of the changes: The scope of the changes made in the pull request should be considered. This will help you know if the pull request is overreaching or if it's a small and focused change.
Collaborate: Engage with the pull request's author and ask questions or suggest modifications, if necessary.
Approve or Reject: After reviewing the pull request, approve or reject it. If you approve it, submit it for merging into the main codebase. If you reject it, provide constructive feedback on what needs to be improved or changed before it can be considered.
Overall, it is essential to review pull requests thoroughly before merging them since this can affect the stability and safety of the code.
In response to a chatgpt label: Summary: This pull request made a small change in README.md file by adding one extra line "lgtm with count test...".
Potential Problems: There are no significant problems that can be identified in this pull request. However, the added line in the pull request may not be relevant for the project or may not add any value to the project.
Suggestion: If the pull request is made to add value to the project, then it should include significant changes relevant to the project. If the added line is not necessary, it can be removed.
I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you you do a better job.
Summary: The changes in the pull request are very minor. It adds two lines of text to the README.md file, which simply say "lgtm with count test...".
Potential Problems: There do not appear to be any major problems with the changes made. However, a reviewer could point out that the changes do not add any significant value to the project and might be considered unnecessary.
Fixing Suggestions: In case the changes are deemed unnecessary, the reviewer could suggest that they be reverted. Otherwise, if the changes must be kept, the reviewer could add a comment acknowledging them as a form of feedback. The reviewer could also remind the contributor to avoid making meaningless commits or changes to the codebase in the future.
/chatgpt hello
xxx
/chatgpt hello.
/chatgpt hello
@wuhuizuo: This is a pull request that adds two lines to the README file. The change has been approved with a "LGTM" (looks good to me) and a count test.
/chatgpt Please help me to review the github pull request, firstly summarize the key changes and identify potential problems, and then give some fixing suggestions, your answer should be markdown format.
@wuhuizuo: Key Changes:
Potential Problems:
Fixing Suggestions:
Example:
This pull request makes two changes to the README.md file. The first change adds an empty line to separate the heading from the new text, improving the readability of the file. The second change provides a brief description of what the repository is about, making it more informative for the readers.
This pull request adds a brief description of the repository to the README.md file, making it more informative for the readers. The new text "lgtm with count test..." is removed as it does not add any substantial value to the file. The commit message is also modified to provide more context about the changes.
/chatgpt Please help me to review the github pull request and, firstly summarize the key changes and identify potential problems, and then give some fixing suggestions. Finally output you answer by markdown format.
@wuhuizuo: Summary:
The pull request contains only one change, which is the addition of a line "lgtm with count test..." in the README.md file.
Potential Problems:
There seem to be no significant problems with this pull request.
Fixing Suggestions:
As there are no issues with this pull request, it can be approved and merged as is.
Markdown Output:
Summary:
Potential Problems:
Fixing Suggestions:
/chatgpt Please help me to review the github pull request with markdown format output, firstly summarize the key changes and identify potential problems, and then give some fixing suggestions.
@wuhuizuo: Based on the diff, the pull request only adds two lines to the README.md file, including a new line with a "lgtm with count test" message. The key changes are very minor and do not affect the functionality of the code.
One potential problem with this pull request is that the added line may not be necessary or relevant to the project. It is also unclear what "lgtm with count test" means or what it is testing. This could be confusing for other contributors or users of the project.
Suggestion to fix:
/chatgpt what's the changed lines?
@wuhuizuo: The changed lines are the two insertions on line 5 and 6 of the README.md file:
+lgtm with count test...
/chatgpt Please help me to review the github pull request: summarize the key changes and identify potential problems, then give some fixing suggestions, all you output should be markdown.
@wuhuizuo:
README.md
file.README.md
file that would be helpful to the users of the repository. Please consider removing the added lines as they do not provide any valuable information regarding the repo.
[FORMAT CHECKER NOTIFICATION]
Notice: To remove the do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue
label, please provide the linked issue number on one line in the PR body, for example: Issue Number: close #123
or Issue Number: ref #456
.
:open_book: For more info, you can check the "Contribute Code" section in the development guide.
I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.
This pull request updates the README.md file by adding a new line lgtm with count test...
to the file.
There seem to be no issues or problems with this pull request at this time.
Since there seem to be no issues with this pull request, no fixes are necessary.
This is a well-formatted and straightforward pull request that updates the README.md file by adding a new line to it. The changes proposed are clear and concise, and there appear to be no issues or potential problems with this pull request. Hence, it can be approved and merged into the main codebase.
/chatgpt review it and give brief message.
@wuhuizuo: This is a very simple PR that updates the README.md file with some minor changes. No significant code changes are made. The change is approved with an LGTM (Looks Good to Me) comment.
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close
.
Send feedback to sig-community-infra or wuhuizuo.
/lifecycle stale
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close
.
Send feedback to sig-community-infra or Mini256.
/lifecycle rotten
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Problem Summary:
What is changed and how it works?
Proposal: xxx
What's Changed:
How it Works:
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note