Closed HatakeKiki closed 2 years ago
i use one of the coco model with swin (either B or L, I don't remember exactly).
I simply took the baseline number from openpcdet (and they are both R11 recall numbers). I noticed there are up to 1 point variations so it is also possible that a new iteration of training differs from download/paper results. Additionally, it seems that results with Car / Cyclists training are more stable than the training with all three classes.
I push the code at https://github.com/tianweiy/OpenPCDet I will add some docs later
@tianweiy Thanks for your wonderful work and patient explanation. Are the docs released later? I want to test virtual point on KITTI and Waymo datasets, and meet diffcults Thanks, again.
I will add some tonight. Thanks for the interest!
你好,我复现VIRTUAL_KITTI.md里的代码,但是发现python demo/demo.py --input ../data/kitti/training/image_2 --output ../data/kitti/training/seg_2/ MODEL.WEIGHTS model_final_7505c4.pkl,这里demo.py设置的config文件并没有,detectron2里也没相关文件代码,包括参数MODEL.WEIGHTS model_final_7505c4.pkl也是,请问这是完整的md吗?
应该是这个folder https://github.com/facebookresearch/MaskFormer/tree/main/configs
然后模型应该是这个里面的link 下载的 https://github.com/tianweiy/OpenPCDet/blob/master/VIRTUAL_KITTI.md
PS:MVP这个repo 已经很老很老了,你可能可以看看一些最新的follow up 方法 e.g. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.02314.pdf 效果应该是好不少的
Hi! Thank you for your work!
Method | Car@R40_moderate | Cyclist@R40_moderate | Pedestrian@R40_moderate PointPillars(my training) | 77.4143 | 64.2696 | 50.4214 PointPillars(download) | 78.3964 | 62.8074 | 51.4145 PointPillars(in paper) | 77.3 | 62.7 | 52.3
How can I get the results in your paper? Are there any changes I need to make?