Closed willwray closed 2 years ago
It's meant to be a standard BSD license, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses . Looking now I can see it resembles the "three clause" version which does omit the "All rights reserved", so I suppose there's no harm in removing it.
Firstly, apologies for bringing this up! (I'm a open source proponent, not a lawyer, and don't grok most license discussions.)
The LICENSE.md file starts with
Err, ARR... "All rights reserved" sounds, to me, contradictory to likely intent. So I searched to see what the legal meaning might be. Here's a link to, and a quotes from, an answer to a similar question:
MIT license and "All rights reserved."?
Please clarify intent.