Closed jlxAtNovozymes closed 1 year ago
I'm not sure about the standard error computation is right or not. I guess standard error is standard deviation divided by square root of number, not the number. it's still in Chapter 12.3
I believe we've got it correct on the first part of your question:
## 95% conf interval:
qnorm(.025, lower.tail=FALSE)
#> [1] 1.959964
## 90% conf interval:
qnorm(.05, lower.tail=FALSE)
#> [1] 1.644854
Created on 2023-04-04 with reprex v2.0.2
I guess standard error is standard deviation divided by square root of number, not the number
That is correct. We'll fix that.
This issue has been automatically locked. If you believe you have found a related problem, please file a new issue (with a reprex: https://reprex.tidyverse.org) and link to this issue.
Hi, I'm not stat guy, when l look at this plot, caption under Fig 12.2 caught my attention. I guess the number should be 95% not 90%?. is that true?