Closed EmilHvitfeldt closed 4 years ago
I'm not a fan of this. It is only fast because it pushes the work on the user. I think that we would end up fielding issues in our repos because it deliberately operates differently than most packages.
Alright, sounds reasonable.
what about naive_bayes()
from the naivebayes package? That one was available in caret.
That looks fine. Should I or do you want to take a shot at it?
I can take a shot at it
This issue has been automatically locked. If you believe you have found a related problem, please file a new issue (with a reprex: https://reprex.tidyverse.org) and link to this issue.
Would you be open for a PR adding https://github.com/mskogholt/fastNaiveBayes as an engine to
naive_bayes()
?