Make better use of {cli}

[EmilHvitfeldt]

This is a collection issue I'll use to keep track of all the {cli} based changes that is going to happen over the next couple of months.

Infrastructure

• check_new_data() https://github.com/tidymodels/recipes/pull/1014 (old)
• check_type() https://github.com/tidymodels/recipes/pull/1235
• recipes_eval_select() https://github.com/tidymodels/recipes/pull/1238
• check_name() https://github.com/tidymodels/recipes/pull/1240
• get_keep_original_cols() https://github.com/tidymodels/recipes/pull/1241
• case weights functions https://github.com/tidymodels/recipes/pull/1242
• check_nominal_type() https://github.com/tidymodels/recipes/pull/1245
• smaller functions in formula.R and misc.R https://github.com/tidymodels/recipes/pull/1244
• roles functions in roles.R https://github.com/tidymodels/recipes/pull/1246
• everything in recipe.R https://github.com/tidymodels/recipes/pull/1251
• everything non-abort() https://github.com/tidymodels/recipes/pull/1264

Steps

• https://github.com/tidymodels/recipes/pull/1255
• https://github.com/tidymodels/recipes/pull/1262

[EmilHvitfeldt]

I have been using .var to denote variables in the data set, but I'm wondering if .field is better?

[simonpcouch]

I feel conflicted about .var vs. .field, too. In many cases I prefer the appearance of .field but also try to be faithful to the type of thing over the way the thing appears, since ultimately cli could change that mapping whenever.

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue has been automatically locked. If you believe you have found a related problem, please file a new issue (with a reprex https://reprex.tidyverse.org) and link to this issue.