Open jennybc opened 4 years ago
Agreed, and I believe the names of the functions fct_relevel, fct_recode, fct_reorder all need some re-consideration. I discussed it in: https://github.com/tidyverse/forcats/issues/269
If it helps, you can think of the 2d as "2d"
I'm a huge fan of
fct_reorder2()
, for the reasons highlighted here:Gist: https://gist.github.com/jennybc/847c6b43c4e35cec2e5bb30a3f38af73
Maybe the under-appreciation for
fct_reorder2()
is partially due to its name? It doesn't really evoke what the function does.I don't have a great alternative but something along the lines of
fct_reorder_for_legend()
?