Great work on the new functions converting NAs to levels/values!
This is subjective, but I wonder if the functions would be better named in a more concise way for better human readability. As NA can only either be a value or a level, it makes sense to me that you don't need to specify what it is being changed from
So status quo:
fct_na_value_to_levelfct_na_level_to_value
Great work on the new functions converting NAs to levels/values!
This is subjective, but I wonder if the functions would be better named in a more concise way for better human readability. As NA can only either be a value or a level, it makes sense to me that you don't need to specify what it is being changed from
So status quo:
fct_na_value_to_level
fct_na_level_to_value
Proposed:
fct_na_to_level
fct_na_to_value