Closed jwhendy closed 1 year ago
The output looks fine when you copied and pasted it this time.
Bah, I apologize. Given your feedback @hadley I think your observation was just on the footnote, then (that's all that seems different). I was comparing to what you pasted, so I thought it was that mine had a ton of other content vs. yours was super short.
If it's just about the footnote, I recall having gotten tripped up by the preview render, likely due to me having inserted backticks before pasting, then pasting (and reprex includes its own backticks) and then I went to clean things up and deleted the wrong set (before the footnote).
Does that all track? If so, sorry for the time waste, I think this was just user error + confusion over what, exactly, wasn't looking right to you (and me to inexperienced to know).
This is carried over from an issue reported in tidyr.
Hadley asked me for a reprex, I hadn't used this package before, attempted to follow the instructions, and Hadley thought my result was incorrect. I repeated the process and got the same result, so I offered to post it here.
Here is my process. I'm using Rstudio 2023.06.1+437 (2023.06.1+437) with R 4.2.3 (2023-03-15) on Mac OS, 13.6.2.
library(reprex)
Now that I've copied, I go back to R console and run
reprex()
.Now I cmd + v to paste:
Created on 2023-11-10 with reprex v2.0.2
You can compare with Hadley's output in this comment. Is it just the included backtrace that's unexpected?
Edit: adding
sessionInfo()
: