Closed earowang closed 4 years ago
I think it is simpler to interpret when starting at 1.
Yes, it should start at 1.
On Mon., 27 Jul. 2020, 15:25 Rob J Hyndman, notifications@github.com wrote:
I think it is simpler to interpret when starting at 1.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/tidyverts/feasts/issues/111#issuecomment-664126324, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD3BJFYG5HZG5JO6TA4UZTLR5UFTRANCNFSM4PILZCEA .
library(feasts)
#> Loading required package: fabletools
lynx_tsbl <- as_tsibble(lynx)
gg_season(lynx_tsbl, value, period = "40 year")
Created on 2020-07-28 by the reprex package (v0.3.0)
The x-axis values are not expected, akin to other relevant issues.
Cheers, Earo
On 29 Jul 2020, at 1:46, mitchelloharawild wrote:
library(feasts) #> Loading required package: fabletools lynx_tsbl <- as_tsibble(lynx) gg_season(lynx_tsbl, value, period = "40 year")
Created on 2020-07-28 by the reprex package (v0.3.0)
-- You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/tidyverts/feasts/issues/111#issuecomment-665050123
Should the series of
1821
start at 0 instead of 21?Created on 2020-07-27 by the reprex package (v0.3.0)