fix(mapping_based_calibrator): typo in the lidar-lidar calibrator

Description

As pointed in https://github.com/tier4/CalibrationTools/issues/209, the checkKeyframeLost was wrongly computed due to a typo that ignored one of the conditions. This PR addresses that issue.

Tests performed

None

Notes for reviewers

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

[x] I've confirmed the contribution guidelines.
[x] The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

[ ] The PR follows the pull request guidelines.
[ ] The PR has been properly tested.
[ ] The PR has been reviewed by the code owners.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

[ ] There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.
[ ] The PR is ready for merge.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (bab5400) to head (2334c0e). Report is 25 commits behind head on tier4/universe.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...apping_based_calibrator/src/calibration_mapper.cpp	0.00%	1 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## tier4/universe #211 +/- ## ================================================= - Coverage 0.93% 0.00% -0.94% ================================================= Files 270 28 -242 Lines 21339 2653 -18686 Branches 383 223 -160 ================================================= - Hits 200 0 -200 + Misses 20982 2653 -18329 + Partials 157 0 -157 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/tier4/CalibrationTools/pull/211/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=tier4) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [differential](https://app.codecov.io/gh/tier4/CalibrationTools/pull/211/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=tier4) | `0.00% <0.00%> (?)` | | | [total](https://app.codecov.io/gh/tier4/CalibrationTools/pull/211/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=tier4) | `?` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=tier4#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

tier4 / CalibrationTools