Closed cooljeanius closed 11 months ago
@cooljeanius Just added! Releasing today: https://github.com/tif-calin/votevote/pull/10
I'd love to hear more about why you're such a fan of Black's method. To be quite honest I found it kinda... boring? It doesn't even feel like a real voting method. Just a mashing of two existing voting methods (sorta) together.
I'd love to hear more about why you're such a fan of Black's method. To be quite honest I found it kinda... boring? It doesn't even feel like a real voting method. Just a mashing of two existing voting methods (sorta) together.
Basically, just because it meets a large number of criteria for what we might consider a "good" method: it satisfies Anonymity, Neutrality, Unanimity, Majority, Condorcet, Anti-Condorcet, Monotonicity, and Pareto, for a total of 8. (Of course, Copeland's Method also satisfies all 8 of these criteria, but I believe that you already had that one.)
Ref.: Robinson Jr., E. Arthur; Ullman, Daniel H. (2011). A Mathematical Look at Politics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, an imprint of Taylor and Francis Group, LLC. p. 74. ISBN 978-1-4398-1983-8.
Haha yeah. I feel like most voting theory nerds that judge by number of mathematical criteria met would say something like River or Ranked Pairs. I don't know that many fellow nerds but I you're the first I've met that likes Black the most
Anyways thanks for opening the issue and chatting. Since Black's is now implemented I'm gonna go ahead and close it
This is already listed in the TODO checklist in the README, but I'm hoping that opening an issue for it will lead to greater prioritization of it: basically, I'm kind of a fan of Black's Method, and would like to see it included: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black%27s_method