Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Implemented on Windows as r224.
Since this is the first time I put hands on C code a review would be needed.
Original comment by billiej...@gmail.com
on 7 Mar 2009 at 3:17
Implemented on Linux as r225.
Original comment by billiej...@gmail.com
on 7 Mar 2009 at 1:00
Implemented on FreeBSD as r238. Note that get_cpu_percent() returns results
different
from top/ps since we are calculating it from raw data rather than using the
kernel's
"pctcpu" value used by top/ps. Not sure if this is better or worse in the long
run,
it may be necessary in the future to implement a platform-specific
get_cpu_percent()
for FreeBSD to return the value from pctcpu.
Original comment by jlo...@gmail.com
on 9 Mar 2009 at 3:44
Well we've got a problem with this on OS X. To read this data you need
task_for_pid()
which requires the user or application to be a member of the procmod group, or
the
script must be run as root.
The best we can do is raise AccessDenied appropriately but it means psutil
simply
won't be able to get CPU (or memory) data for a process unless psutil is being
executed in a root context or at the very least, as a member of procmod group.
Original comment by jlo...@gmail.com
on 13 Mar 2009 at 4:28
IMO, it would make sense implementing CPU times this way by raising
AccessDenied when
necessary, closing out this issue as fixed and opening a new one as reminder in
case
we discover a task_for_pid() replacement.
Original comment by billiej...@gmail.com
on 13 Mar 2009 at 4:58
Documentation and docstrings should also be updated to reflect this behavior.
Original comment by billiej...@gmail.com
on 13 Mar 2009 at 5:00
I wouldn't bother opening a new issue for it, there's nothing wrong with using
the
appropriate OS system calls so we'll just treat it as a known issue and leave
it at that.
In r255 I've removed get_cpu_times/create_time from the __str__() method and
wrapped
cpu times in a try/except in the Process constructor to account for this. I
have not
yet implemented the code into the OS X module but once I do the _psutil module
should
be ready for it at least.
Original comment by jlo...@gmail.com
on 13 Mar 2009 at 5:15
Original comment by billiej...@gmail.com
on 17 Mar 2009 at 4:15
Implemented on OS X as r270.
Closing out this one.
Original comment by billiej...@gmail.com
on 20 Mar 2009 at 9:15
[deleted comment]
Updated csets after the SVN -> Mercurial migration:
r224 == revision 74261592f147
r225 == revision e7ec84bc5f8e
r238 == revision 1e121fde0c0e
r255 == revision 134cd2857e1a
r270 == revision de3eed0d4a28
Original comment by g.rodola
on 2 Mar 2013 at 11:46
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
billiej...@gmail.com
on 7 Mar 2009 at 3:15