tighten / parental

Use single table inheritance in your Laravel app
MIT License
1.36k stars 98 forks source link

Support for Laravel 10 #108

Closed wilfredchen closed 1 year ago

ziming commented 1 year ago

Hi @techenby

You may have forgotten to tag a new release :)

driftingly commented 1 year ago

@ziming @wilfredchen Released as 1.3.2

Thanks @wilfredchen 🙌

benholmen commented 1 year ago

Thanks y'all! 🚀

benholmen commented 1 year ago

Hey @driftingly I'm having trouble with this release and getting my application to a resolvable set of dependencies. This PR and the 1.3.2 tag seem correct in the repo, but composer info and packagist are both reporting out of date dependencies:

❯ composer info tightenco/parental
name     : tightenco/parental
descrip. : A simple eloquent trait that allows relationships to be accessed through child models.
keywords : 
versions : * 1.3.2
type     : library
license  : MIT License (MIT) (OSI approved) https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html#licenseText
homepage : 
source   : [git] https://github.com/tighten/parental.git 5511ee87355516947dd099810c08cdf28a9df036
dist     : [zip] https://api.github.com/repos/tighten/parental/zipball/5511ee87355516947dd099810c08cdf28a9df036 5511ee87355516947dd099810c08cdf28a9df036
path     : /Users/ben/hubventory/vendor/tightenco/parental
names    : tightenco/parental

support
source : https://github.com/tighten/parental/tree/1.3.2

autoload
psr-4
Parental\ => src/

requires
illuminate/database ^9.0
illuminate/events ^9.0
php ^8.0

requires (dev)
orchestra/testbench ^7.0
phpunit/phpunit ^9.5.10

https://packagist.org/packages/tightenco/parental#1.3.2:

image


I noticed the timestamp at packagist is pretty old: 2022-11-16 14:07 UTC

benholmen commented 1 year ago

Looking at it again I think you might need to clean up the tags. There's a 1.3.2 and a v1.3.2 tag.

driftingly commented 1 year ago

Rereleased as v1.3.3 https://github.com/tighten/parental/releases/tag/v1.3.3 When doing the release the last tag with out the v prefix was not listed at the top of the tags so I missed it. Thanks @benholmen for looking into the issue!