Originally posted by **gtr3qq** March 25, 2024
_Spotted this while doing a tune with OPM.
Can hardly contain myself from giggles. 😂
Less kinder ones might moan after all that branding of Exp.Volume.... But I'm not one of those.
If my maths didn't all returns to my teacher, this value should be a volume about 18.75%.
Please remove/patch this. 🤣
Thank you for your amazing tracker!_
Above are the discussion, I'm not really sure if this is worked as intention.
The linear percentages feels like the intent was to mark the volume as percent. But in doing so, forget about exp. scale used for Furnace, i.e. a bug.
Else I don't really see what's the point of having this percentage of the value.
This is a function I cobbled to covert the exp. value to liner....? Uni was a long time ago.😂
e.g. if input a X value of 24, 24/64 of the volume used in OpenMPT and others, the Y is the expected value to put in the furnace tracker 48.
It might be more elegant to use logarithmic function since the X and Y are swapped, and I'm not quite sure if the base should be 2. 🤣
Maths! Brain! Good!
If this is not a bug, I'll close this as fast as possible.
tildearrow
commented
5 months ago
Discussed in https://github.com/tildearrow/furnace/discussions/1822
Above are the discussion, I'm not really sure if this is worked as intention. The linear percentages feels like the intent was to mark the volume as percent. But in doing so, forget about exp. scale used for Furnace, i.e. a bug. Else I don't really see what's the point of having this percentage of the value.
This is a function I cobbled to covert the exp. value to liner....? Uni was a long time ago.😂
e.g. if input a X value of 24, 24/64 of the volume used in OpenMPT and others, the Y is the expected value to put in the furnace tracker 48.
It might be more elegant to use logarithmic function since the X and Y are swapped, and I'm not quite sure if the base should be 2. 🤣
Maths! Brain! Good!
If this is not a bug, I'll close this as fast as possible.
Thanks.