Closed nvkelso closed 6 years ago
What should we do with objects which are shop=chemist amenity=pharmacy? amenity=pharmacy is already handled, this would add shop=chemist.
I would make sure shop=chemist is listed after amenity=pharmacy so kind=pharmacy would result from that combo (lower line number matches win).
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Paul Norman notifications@github.com wrote:
What should we do with objects which are shop=chemist amenity=pharmacy? amenity=pharmacy is already handled, this would add shop=chemist.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/tilezen/vector-datasource/issues/1425#issuecomment-346719014, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA0EO75Ia-3fh9S-jBfldg7Ar5l1VhWrks5s5hxjgaJpZM4QQjEE .
beach kind_detail beach_coarse from http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface???
I'm looking at this and am not sure about it.
The osm.org reference to beach is https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/blob/e3357b27e61c3ee4f4cf51c87fdc94deeaaa7c6f/config/locales/en.yml#L666 and iD has nothing about beach surfaces that I see.
Taginfo shows 19% of beach have surface, and 15% of beach have surface=sand. 1% have surface=pebblestone, and of the remaining 3%, they don't have a common enough tag to make taginfo.
This is from the OSM carto style, for the landuse polygons. We definitely need to include the ones that have polygon symbolizes. The others I care Less about. For now it can be a pass thru, with documenting the common values only.
On Dec 8, 2017, at 18:54, Paul Norman notifications@github.com wrote:
beach kind_detail beach_coarse from http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface???
I'm looking at this and am not sure about it.
The osm.org reference to beach is https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/blob/e3357b27e61c3ee4f4cf51c87fdc94deeaaa7c6f/config/locales/en.yml#L666 and iD has nothing about beach surfaces that I see.
Taginfo shows 19% of beach have surface, and 15% of beach have surface=sand. 1% have surface=pebblestone, and of the remaining 3%, they don't have a common enough tag to make taginfo.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
Looks like only OSM Carto beach_coarse
is a symbolizer for the following surface
values src:
[natural = 'beach'],
[natural = 'shoal'] {
[surface = 'sand'] {
polygon-pattern-file: url('symbols/beach.png');
polygon-pattern-alignment: global;
}
[surface = 'gravel'],
[surface = 'fine_gravel'],
[surface = 'pebbles'],
[surface = 'pebblestone'],
[surface = 'shingle'],
[surface = 'stones'],
[surface = 'shells'] {
polygon-pattern-file: url('symbols/beach_coarse.png');
polygon-pattern-alignment: global;
}
}
Looks like only OSM Carto beach_coarse is a symbolizer for the following surface values src:
SVG files have no direct relationship to OSM tags, e.g. square.svg is just a 1px square used multiple places where we wanted a square for a symbol. The tags go through osm2pgsql to turn into columns (generally a trivial transformation) then the SQL to MSS. In most cases it's easy to read off what the original tag is from the MSS selectors fairly easy, 95% are either [key = 'value']
or using a feature column and have [feature = 'key_value']
. There are exceptions like like the [railway = 'runway']
which used to be used to select objects with aeroway=runway
.
I'll go through and strike out the ones that are only file names, not related to OSM tags.
For grave_yard_christian
, grave_yard_generic
, grave_yard_jewish
, grave_yard_muslim
kind_detail, I have a PR doing that right now, but I'm wondering if those are the best values for kind_detail. I think it would make more sense to have kind_detail of christian, jewish, or muslim, and no kind_detail for where it's not tagged.
This would also apply to kind_detail of forests with leaf_type
and the wetland
values.
I agree, just the religion value should go into kind_detail for graveyards.
On Dec 11, 2017, at 22:55, Paul Norman notifications@github.com wrote:
For grave_yard_christian, grave_yard_generic, grave_yard_jewish, grave_yard_muslim kind_detail, I have a PR doing that right now, but I'm wondering if those are the best values for kind_detail. I think it would make more sense to have kind_detail of christian, jewish, or muslim, and no kind_detail for where it's not tagged.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
Do we really want to duplicate the religion between religion
and kind_detail
fields?
Yes. Religion should then be marked deprecated for 2.0 release.
Sent from my handsful device.
On Dec 14, 2017, at 11:43, Paul Norman notifications@github.com wrote:
Do we really want to duplicate the religion between religion and kind_detail fields?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
barrier=lift_gate
is going into kind_detail (which is fine), but we'll need to add client logic for that. Same for barrier=swing_gate
.
Filed some followup issues for the next milestone but generally everything here is verified (or has an issue). Closing :)
Around 39:
surface
askind_detail
in the landuse and pois layers.~communications ???~denomination
= * to allow forjehovahs_witness
who don't like a cross symbol, and to allow other uses.~military_red_hatch ???~ – put into the landuse layer as military danger area?~oneway_reverse - ??? uhhh oneway=-1? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway~~power_tower_small - what's different from power_tower? ???~power_pole
which is used for this artwork.~square ??? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Square ***~~transport_slipway ??? we have leisure: slipway~Dec. 12th: Looking at https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/blob/master/amenity-points.mss, propose also: