Closed tillmo closed 9 years ago
I am done (based on dol-diff.pdf).
One important question remains:
In the terminology section of the standard we have a term "simple theoroidal logic translation", which didn't exist in the ontology, so I've added it.
However, we did have in the ontology the class SimpleTheoroidalMapping
, which has no counterpart in the terminology.
Do we still need the latter class?
"Simple theoroidal logic translation" is more specific than "simple theoroidal mapping" in two ways:
We could express the same as the intersection of orthogonal classes: SimpleTheoroidalMapping and Translation and LogicTranslation
. Having the specific class SimpleTheoroidalLogicTranslation
in the ontology makes sense if there if there is no simple theoroidal reduction and no simple theoroidal language translation. And even then I'd suggest to keep the class SimpleTheoroidalMapping
, as keeping it will enable us to define SimpleTheoroidalLogicTranslation
in a formally more precise way.
tl;dr: I added SimpleTheoroidalLogicTranslation but kept SimpleTheoroidalMapping.
good, many thanks!
There have been some changes in chapter 4. I have added the term "infrastructure axiom". Also, some of the definitions of terms have changes. Please change the ontology accordingly. The convenience document at https://github.com/tillmo/DOL/raw/master/Standard/dol-diff.pdf can help.