Closed tillmo closed 7 years ago
see 326_define_nodes_and_edges of git@ontohub.org:meta.git Text for FTF: we have now explicitly stated what nodes and edges are.
@tillmo I believe the diff is not correct. It is about LanguageMapping, but you changed the definition of LogicGraph
The diff is not about LanguageMapping. A diff consists of a sequence of hunks. Each hunk starts with @@, and provides some context around the changed lines. Please look at the context at the start of a hunk, not at the end.
Is there a way to guarantee that the hunk includes the relevant class declaration? Because the information that the second hunk is about LogicGraph is missing.
Update: Because the last line of the previous hunk is a declaration of a class (LanguageMapping) this is easy to misread. I just copy the relevant information from the RDF file manually.
OMG proposal added
with git diff -Un
one can enlarge the context of a hunk to n lines (default is 3).
In the DOL ontology, LanguageGraph and LogicGraph: Explicitly state what the nodes and what the edges are
see http://issues.omg.org/browse/DOL-23