issues
search
timapril
/
ns2
Parameterized Nameserver Delegation with NS2 and NS2T
Other
1
stars
0
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
Removing what happens if NS2 and NS2 coexist error
#19
timapril
closed
4 years ago
0
Being more clear that parent records are glue #3
#18
timapril
closed
4 years ago
0
Prohibiting NS2 and NS2T from coexisting at name
#17
timapril
closed
4 years ago
0
Documenting a topic that was skipped
#16
timapril
closed
4 years ago
0
Being more clear about when to include NS2/NS2T #4
#15
timapril
closed
4 years ago
0
Adding a privacy considerations section #6
#14
timapril
closed
4 years ago
0
Readability: Addressing #12
#13
timapril
closed
4 years ago
0
Take another pass at the motivation of NS2/NS2T
#12
timapril
closed
4 years ago
0
Cleaning up the signing requirements - #2
#11
timapril
closed
4 years ago
0
NS2 and NS2T at the same name ?
#10
jrlevine
closed
4 years ago
1
Removing IPv{4,6}hints as discussed in #5
#9
timapril
closed
4 years ago
0
Removing DS and DNSKEY SvcParamKeys from the draft #1
#8
timapril
closed
4 years ago
0
Consider an similar approach to CDS/CDNSKEY for publication in the parent
#7
timapril
closed
4 years ago
3
Add privacy considerations section
#6
timapril
closed
4 years ago
0
ipv4hint and ipv6hint
#5
jrlevine
closed
4 years ago
3
Draft should be clear about what records are returned when
#4
timapril
closed
4 years ago
0
NS2 and NS2T SHOULD appear in parent and child
#3
timapril
closed
4 years ago
1
NS2 and NS2T SHOULD be DNSSEC signed
#2
timapril
closed
4 years ago
2
Remove DS SvcParamField option
#1
timapril
closed
4 years ago
1