Closed timathom closed 9 years ago
MARC 5XX fields with $5 for local notes are being mapped to bf:Work and bf:Instance. However, since these are local notes that apply to a particular institution's holdings, wouldn't it be better to map them to a bf:Annotation for the bf:HeldItem?
<marc:collection xmlns:marc="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"> <marc:record type="Bibliographic"> ... <marc:datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <marc:subfield code="a">In case.</marc:subfield> <marc:subfield code="5">NjP</marc:subfield> </marc:datafield> <marc:datafield tag="541" ind1=" " ind2=" "> <marc:subfield code="c">Purchase;</marc:subfield> <marc:subfield code="d">1958.</marc:subfield> <marc:subfield code="5">NjP</marc:subfield> </marc:datafield> ... </marc:record> </marc:collection>
MARC 5XX fields with $5 for local notes are being mapped to bf:Work and bf:Instance. However, since these are local notes that apply to a particular institution's holdings, wouldn't it be better to map them to a bf:Annotation for the bf:HeldItem?