Open scheng87 opened 6 years ago
@scheng87 I kept the styling pretty minimal on the first pass. Please let me know if you would like it more prettied up. Thanks.
Hi Kent
Thanks! I forgot to add text for each one re: funding and support. I can add that text here shortly along with logos.
One of the things that could be done is perhaps putting some sort of clear boundary or border between the tabs and the content? Or giving the tabs backgrounds so they stand out a bit more like buttons.
@scheng87, would you still like to add more here? Thanks.
@scheng87 in https://github.com/timelyportfolio/ebc_portal/issues/13#issuecomment-386662200 it seemed you wanted to add more. Is this still true? Thanks.
we need to add an about section for each explore by - link
options: add a tab to the row so it reads "visualization, table, download, about this evidence map"
For Conservation and Human Well-Being:
"This data was generated using a peer-reviewed systematic map protocol (Bottrill et al. 2014 (https://environmentalevidencejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2047-2382-3-16)) and documented in McKinnon et al. 2016 (https://environmentalevidencejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13750-016-0058-7). This systematic map consists of articles that measure some impact of a nature-based conservation intervention (as defined by the IUCN-Conservation Measures Partnership (IUCN-CMP) Unified Classification of Conservation Actions) on aspects of human well-being. This map is limited to studies that examined these impacts in non-OECD countries.
For more information on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria and parameters of this search, please refer to the systematic map protocol in Environmental Evidence.
For metadata on data columns, please refer to the codebook from McKinnon et al. 2016."
For Forests and Poverty:
"This data was generated using a peer-reviewed systematic map protocol (Cheng et al. 2017 (https://environmentalevidencejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13750-016-0058-7). The completed systematic map article is currently in review. This systematic map consists of articles that measure links between forest-based productive activities categorized using the PRIME framework (Shyamsundar et al. 2017 https://www.profor.info/content/prime-pathways-toward-prosperity) on poverty alleviation. This map is global in scope.
For more information on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria and parameters of this search, please refer to the systematic map protocol in Environmental Evidence.
For metadata on data columns, please refer to the codebook from Cheng et al. 2016."